Did you know that Revelation was dated incorrectly and has already taken place?
Introduction:
The church father, Irenaeus, wrote in “against heresies” that Jesus was in his 50’s when he was crucified. This is the same man that said John wrote Revelation in the 90’s A.D. during the reign of Trajan. Irenaeus is from the second century and is the main source that Christianity counts on for its dating of eschatological theology. If Irenaeus got it wrong about Jesus then how can he be right about John writing Revelation during the reign of Trajan? That being the case means that Revelation has been misdated (Against Heresies, Book II, Chapter 22).
The Problem
Christian scholars count on the church fathers quite a bit to understand the apostles who came before the church fathers were born. The church fathers are middle men who do not have any direct connection with the apostles. We don’t start hearing about the church fathers until the second century. How much can historic knowledge change in 100 years? One look at our US Constitution will prove that facts get changed and or misunderstood just a few years after a historical event.
The Solution
Revelation was written before the fall of Jerusalem because it revealed what would happen during the fall of Jerusalem. Revelation is a Jewish book and is replete with Jewish symbolism and spiritualism and eschatology. There are over one hundred of New Testament verses that have Jesus Christ’s return happening soon after he left to go back up to heaven.
No verses exist that say that Jesus is gonna take thousands of years before he comes back. The false prophets of today keep messing up their predictions on interpretations of the Bible to prove that Jesus is coming back 2000 years after he said he was coming back soon. And Jesus understands what “soon” means, which doesn’t mean 2000 years.
The angel had John measure the Temple in Revelation. There was no Temple to measure after 70 A.D. when it got destroyed by the Romans. That’s a pretty big clue that Revelation was written before 70 A.D. Irenaeus was as wrong about the dating of Revelation as he was about Christ’s age at his crucifixion.
Summarize and Call to action
It’s amazing to me that the church relies on one brief statement from a man who can’t get his facts straight. Even though external evidence can be helpful to Bible exposition, the Bible explains the Bible and doesn’t need man’s explanation of it.
People have the propensity of allowing others to explain the Bible. When we allow others to teach us the Bible we absorb the teachers’ biases as well. When we trust one like Irenaeus for a whole theology who is proven wrong in theology, we become unsteady as that man. That is why it’s a good idea to read scripture without any paradigms guiding us such as pre-millennial dispensationalism. We must take a systematic approach to Scripture and not take it out of context to make it fit our understanding of the Bible. And that’s all there is to it!
